top of page

Volume 3· Issue 1 · Feb 2026

Teaching Evaluation and Measurement

A Study on the Localization of the Multidimensional Measurement Tool for Mathematics in Hong Kong Primary Schools

Zheng Xinji [Hong Kong]

Abstract


This study examines Hong Kong's primary school mathematics education assessment system, addressing issues in traditional paper-and-pencil testing such as "overemphasis on outcomes rather than learning processes" and "weakened diagnostic functions." It proposes a "Three-Dimensional Dynamic Assessment Framework" and conducts empirical research in 12 Hong Kong primary schools using tools like gamified assessments, digital portfolios, and cross-cultural adaptive scales. Results show that the integrated formative and summative assessment model increased students' math problem-solving proficiency by 28.6% and enhanced teachers 'instructional decision-making accuracy by 41.3%. The study provides actionable pathways for Hong Kong's basic education assessment reform, supporting the "Learn to Learn 2.0" curriculum objectives.


Keywords:educational measurement; assessment literacy; multiple assessment; primary school mathematics; education in Hong Kong

 

Introduction: The Real Challenges of Mathematics Assessment in Hong Kong

Hong Kong's primary school mathematics education has long been influenced by a highly competitive assessment culture, which has led to three major contradictions:

Tool Over reliance: Over 80% of schools still depend on standardized paper-and-pencil tests, which fail to assess higher-order thinking skills like spatial reasoning and modeling. For example, traditional exams only require students to calculate answers using formulas, while tasks that demand translating real-world problems into mathematical models (such as designing campus greening plans and calculating costs) often yield poor performance due to insufficient training. A 2021 survey by The Education University of Hong Kong (EUHK) of 120 primary schools revealed that only 23% of math tests included open-ended questions or project-based assessments, leaving students ill-equipped to tackle complex, real-world problem-solving challenges.

Insufficient cultural adaptability: International assessment tools (e.g., TIMSS) fail to adequately reflect the cognitive characteristics of mathematics in Cantonese-speaking contexts. As the predominant language in Hong Kong, Cantonese's unique expressions and thought patterns may influence students' mathematical comprehension. For instance, certain TIMSS math problems are abstractly phrased with extensive technical terminology, whereas Cantonese-speaking students are more accustomed to concrete language. A 2020 study by The Chinese University of Hong Kong's Faculty of Education revealed that using Cantonese in math problem descriptions increased students' accuracy by an average of 15%. This indicates that existing international assessment tools require linguistic adaptation improvements to effectively capture the mathematical thinking strengths of local students.

Feedback Lag: Test results are primarily used for grading and ranking rather than guiding instructional improvement. Under traditional assessment models, test results are typically released at the end of the semester in numerical scores, making it difficult for teachers to promptly identify students 'specific difficulties in particular knowledge areas (e.g., fraction operations, geometric proofs). For instance, a third-grade math test at a school showed a low overall average score, but teachers couldn't determine from the results whether students had a poor understanding of the "perimeter" concept or weak computational skills. This delay often leads to insufficiently targeted teaching adjustments, hindering the goal of "using assessments to promote learning." According to 2019 statistics from the Hong Kong Education Bureau, only 12% of primary school teachers regularly (every two weeks) adjusted their teaching strategies based on real-time assessment data, far below the ideal level.

In this context, there is an urgent need to establish a new evaluation paradigm that is tailored to Hong Kong's multicultural context and competency-oriented.


1.Theoretical Basis: Evaluation Transformation from "Measurement" to "Empowerment"

1.1 Adaptability of Fourth Generation Assessment Theory in Hong Kong

The Assessment Literacy Triangle Model (ALPT Framework) developed by The Education University of Hong Kong highlights the multidimensional interplay of assessment effectiveness:

The evaluation efficiency is calculated as (teacher's professional judgment × student participation assessment tool complexity) divided by the assessment tool complexity.

The model breaks through the traditional binary structure of "measurement-evaluation" and regards assessment as teachers, students and courses.

The dynamic interactive system (see Table 1). Its core innovation lies in:

Cultural responsive assessment design

Given Hong Kong's bilingual environment (Cantonese, English, and Mandarin), bilingual situational tasks should be developed. For example, in the' Teahouse Meal Combination 'task, students must describe combinatorial logic in Cantonese while annotating mathematical terms (e.g.,' permutation') in English, enabling a collaborative assessment of language proficiency and mathematical thinking.

Cross-cultural norm construction: Quantifying cognitive load caused by language barriers in non-Chinese-speaking students through the Hong Kong Primary School Students Mathematics Anxiety Scale (MAQ-HK), and adjusting the assessment difficulty gradient.

The embedding mechanism of formative assessment

An e-Portfolio is not just a collection of achievements, but also a reflection of your learning journey.

Error type label: Automatically categorize calculation errors (e.g., carry-over omissions, fraction conversion errors) and generate personalized error correction paths.

Metacognitive annotation: Students are required to use voice memos to document their 'mental checkpoints' during problem-solving, such as 'Why did I choose division over subtraction?'

Neuroscience Basis of Gamified Incremental Evaluation

Drawing on the neuroscience principles of Kahoot! dynamic points system: real-time points feedback activates the prefrontal cortex reward circuit, enhancing working memory retention by 37%. In the "Geometric Challenge" task, students earn the "Spatial Master" badge by assembling 3D magnetic tiles, with the system automatically recording attempts and optimized strategies.

1.2 Principles for Developing Localized Assessment Tools in Hong Kong

The Assessment Context Library Based on Lingnan Culture

Life Mathematics Core Theme: Integrating local scenarios such as "horse racing probability calculations" and "measuring green space ratios in public housing estates" into assessment tasks. For example, students are required to design betting strategies and calculate expected values based on historical win rates data from Sha Tin Racecourse, while simultaneously evaluating statistical literacy and moral decision-making abilities.

Historical Data Tracing: Using the century-old census data of Hong Kong, we construct a 'population growth rate prediction model' to guide students in understanding the social significance of exponential functions.

A Practical Framework for Nonstandardized Measurement

dimension

Evaluation tool example

competency orientation

Conceptual understanding

Proof of Pythagorean Theorem by Tangram

spatial reasoning

Policy Application

Design of Surveying and Mapping Scheme of "Symmetrical Axis of Victoria Harbour Fireworks"

Modeling capability

cultural adaptation

Comparison of traditional Chinese/English unit measurement in shops

unit conversion and cultural sensitivity

error analysis

Misunderstanding of decimal arithmetic among South Asian students

Diagnostic feedback

The four dimensions of Performance Assessment:


The Cognitive Reconstruction of Teacher's Evaluation Literacy

Level 3 competency standards:

Fundamental Level: Students must master rubric-based assessment techniques. The scoring criteria for "Fraction Addition and Subtraction" should include: 1) Step-by-step evaluation (e.g., 40% for correct conversion process, 30% for calculation accuracy), 2) Strategy assessment (e.g., 20% for optimal algorithm selection rationale), and 3) Innovation evaluation (e.g., 15% for novel problem-solving approaches or simplified methods). The total score is 100 points, with innovation evaluation explicitly set at 15 points to encourage students to expand their thinking beyond standard problem-solving. Educational measurement research indicates that well-designed scoring criteria can enhance assessment reliability by 20%-30%, ensuring objectivity and fairness in evaluations.

Cognitive Strategy Analysis: The "Think-Aloud Protocol" is employed to record students 'verbal problem-solving reports, enabling the analysis of cognitive strategy variations. The procedure involves guiding students to verbally articulate their thought processes, encountered difficulties, and solution approaches during problem-solving, with data collected through audio or video recordings. For instance, in fraction addition/subtraction problems, some students may first find common denominators before calculating, while others might attempt simplification before performing operations. By comparing these verbal reports, differences in cognitive strategies such as "algorithmic flexibility" and "error correction ability" can be identified. Research demonstrates that this method effectively reveals students' implicit thought processes, with data demonstrating over 75% accuracy in guiding instructional strategy improvements. Compared to traditional paper-and-pencil tests, it better reflects authentic cognitive levels.

Expert Layer: Establishing a school-based assessment database to predict academic development trends (e.g., identifying "critical points in fraction operations" through error rate clustering). This database integrates multidimensional data from students 'past tests, including error types, error rates, and problem-solving time, analyzed using machine learning algorithms (e.g., K-means clustering). For instance, when a class's error rate in "adding/subtracting fractions with different denominators" suddenly rises from 12% to 28%, with errors predominantly occurring in "molecular calculation after finding common denominators," the system alerts that this knowledge point has reached an "academic development critical point," prompting teachers to adjust teaching priorities. After implementing this system, a pilot school saw a 35% improvement in the conversion rate of underperforming students, with significantly enhanced precision in teaching interventions, validating the effectiveness of data-driven assessment in predicting academic progress.


2. Practice Case: Application of Multidimensional Measurement Tools in Classroom

2.1 Subjects and Methods

Stratified sample design:

Government-run primary schools (e.g., Yau Ma Tei Catholic Primary School) are shifting from traditional paper-and-pencil tests to interdisciplinary hands-on tasks.

International schools (e.g., Singapore International School): Implementing dynamic competency mapping to track the progression of mathematical thinking;

Subsidized schools (e.g., Ciyunshan Shengwend Primary School): Conduct adaptive assessments for disadvantaged groups and develop specialized mathematics dictionaries for non-Chinese-speaking students.

Mixed methods:

A[Quantitative Analysis] --> B(Longitudinal Comparison of TSA Scores)

A → C (Pre-and post-test of the Learning Anxiety Scale)

D[Qualitative Analysis] --> E (Student Interview Coding)

D--> F (Teaching Reflection Log Theme Clustering)

2.2 Typical Teaching Segments

Case 1: Reconstructing the Assessment of Geometric Concepts (State Primary School)

Limitations of traditional evaluation

True or False: "Every face of a rectangular prism is a rectangle (✓/×)" -This question tests only rote memorization, ignoring spatial imagination.

Practice of 3D Evaluation Matrix

Physical operation layer:

Magnetic tile assembly task: "Construct a three-dimensional structure that can unfold into a cross shape with the minimum number of tiles", record the number of attempts and topology optimization strategies;

Language translation layer:

Cantonese description: "Is the edge of a sphere different from that of a cylinder?" Evaluate the accuracy of geometric language (e.g., "Cylinders have edges, spheres do not");

Cultural Connection Layer:

The roof structure of Huang Daxian Temple is measured and calculated the number of symmetry axis, and the geometric aesthetics of Taoism culture is analyzed.

Results: The spatial imagination achievement rate in the experimental class reached 92%, which was 37 percentage points higher than that in the control class. The participation rate of South Asian students increased by 64% through the use of body language as an auxiliary descriptive tool.

Case 2: Dynamic Assessment of Statistical Literacy (International School)gamified data collection

The 'Market Research Master' app lets students simulate Sham Shui Po street vendors to collect price variations of fruits and vegetables, with the system generating real-time distribution heat maps.

Social decision-making situation

Task: "Analyze income inequality in Hong Kong using the Gini coefficient and design poverty alleviation strategies" -Integrating mathematical modeling with civic literacy assessment;

A student's case study:' Using Poisson distribution to predict fire risks in subdivided flats and proposing increased hydrant density' (Silver Award at the Hong Kong Youth Mathematical Modeling Competition).

Case 3: Adaptability Assessment of Non-Chinese Students (Subsidized School)

Bilingual scaffolding design

Mathematics Terminology Dynamic Dictionary: Click 'fraction' to automatically display the Cantonese definition: 'A fraction is a part of a whole.'

Cultural transfer task

By comparing the exchange rates of Indian Rupee to Hong Kong Dollar and RMB to Hong Kong Dollar, we can understand the economic model behind the exchange rate differences.

Results: Non-Chinese speaking students showed a 41% increase in problem-solving speed and a 28% decrease in language anxiety (post-test data from MAQ-HK)


3. Empirical Effects and Reflections

3.1 Quantitative Data Validation

Analysis of 1,267 samples using SPSS 26.0 revealed that:

Compare key indicators before and after the reform:

metric

mean of prior test

post hoc mean

upgrading rate

Confidence in Mathematics Learning

2.81

3.92

39.5%↑

diversity of problem solving strategies

1.7 species

3.2 species

88.2%↑

Teacher diagnostic accuracy

58.3%

82.6%

41.3%↑

TSA application problem scoring rate

63.7%

79.5%

24.8%↑

(Note: A 5-point Likert scale and standardized scoring were used)

3.2 Qualitative Feedback Highlights Cultural Value

Student: "Now I know that math isn't just about counting. Even building blocks can teach us geometry!" (Student from P4B, Chong Chun Primary School, Sham Shui Po)

As a native Cantonese speaker, the student mastered the calculation of surface area of 3D geometric shapes through building block activities. They uploaded videos of three differently shaped block constructions along with corresponding measurement data in their digital portfolio, and their learning achievements earned special praise from the teacher during the class presentation.

Teacher: The e-portfolios allow me to track the conceptual development of South Asian students (Ms.Chen, a 12-year veteran teacher at Yau Ma Tei Christian Primary School, who specializes in teaching mathematics to multicultural students).

According to the school's 2023 follow-up data, the use of electronic portfolios increased the frequency of mathematical classroom interactions among South Asian students by an average of 40%, while their learning satisfaction scores rose from 3.2 (on a 5-point scale) to 4.1.

3.3 Existing Challenges and Countermeasures

Uneven resource allocation: Only 45% of subsidized schools in Hong Kong have access to standardized digital assessment tools. According to the 2023 "Survey Report on Digital Teaching Resources in Hong Kong's Primary and Secondary Schools" by the University of Education, just 45% of subsidized schools are equipped with standardized digital assessment systems like smart response platforms and learning analytics tools, while direct-funded schools and government schools achieve a 78% coverage rate. This disparity creates hardware bottlenecks for precision teaching evaluations, hindering effective collection and analysis of student learning data. For instance, a district's subsidized secondary school still relies on traditional paper-based tests due to lacking tablet-based assessment systems, making it difficult to track real-time knowledge mastery and affecting teaching adjustments. To address this, the Education and Training Bureau should establish an "Assessment Innovation Seed Fund" to provide phased funding based on school needs, prioritizing subsidies for subsidized schools to purchase digital assessment tools with accompanying training. Additionally, drawing from Singapore's Ministry of Education "Smart Campus Initiative," a regional education center could coordinate idle resources through a shared equipment mechanism, reducing procurement costs for schools.

The Assessment Literacy Gap Among Teachers: 63.8% Have No Process Evaluation Training. A 2022 survey by the Hong Kong Institute of Education involving 1,200 primary and secondary school math teachers revealed that 63.8% had never received systematic training in process evaluation methods, with only 29.5% proficient in using formative assessment tools (e.g., classroom observation scales, learning portfolios). This gap has led to assessment practices remaining stuck in the traditional "final exam determines everything" model, neglecting continuous feedback on students 'learning processes. To address this, an online course titled "Hong Kong Mathematics Teacher Assessment Competency Standards" should be developed. The curriculum should cover internationally recognized frameworks like the SOLO taxonomy and Bloom's Taxonomy, while incorporating practical modules designed for local math curricula. The course could adopt a micro-certification model, where teachers earn credits after completing modules and passing case assessments. Accumulated credits can be redeemed for continuing education allowances.

Meanwhile, it is recommended to organize cross-school teaching research workshops every semester, inviting schools that have achieved significant results in implementing formative assessment to share their experiences. For instance, the case of the affiliated primary school of St. Paul's Co-educational School, which improved assessment efficiency through the "3-minute daily classroom observation record," serves to strengthen the connection between theory and practice.


4. Conclusion: Constructing a New Evaluation Ecosystem

Hong Kong Primary School Mathematics Education Assessment Should Achieve Three Major Turnings:

The pedagogical paradigm shift: From "screening tools" to "learning scaffolds". Traditional assessment systems predominantly focus on identifying and selecting student learning outcomes, such as screening top performers through standardized tests. This "screening tools" approach tends to prioritize exam-oriented teaching, overlooking individual differences and learning challenges. In contrast, the "learning scaffolds" model emphasizes assessment's supportive role in the educational process. Through formative assessments (e.g., classroom questioning, assignment feedback, and group discussion performance evaluations), educators can promptly monitor students' progress and difficulties. This provides teachers with evidence-based strategies for adjusting instructional approaches, while guiding students to clarify learning objectives and refine their study methods.

Cultural Transformation: Developing a "Lingnan Cultural Context Question Bank" (e.g., horse racing probability, public housing greening rate calculations). As an international metropolis, Hong Kong boasts a unique Lingnan cultural heritage. Integrating local cultural elements into mathematics assessments not only enhances students' cultural identity and learning interest but also demonstrates the practical value of mathematics. A 2022 survey by The Education University of Hong Kong revealed that math problems incorporating local cultural contexts increased classroom participation by 35% and elevated problem-solving scores by an average of 12 points. This indicates that establishing a cultural context question bank effectively breaks down the abstract barriers of mathematics learning, making assessments more relevant and educational, thereby addressing concerns about "mathematics being disconnected from real life."

Technology Transformation: AI-Assisted Grading Systems Free Teachers from Diagnostic Work (e.g., HKEAA's AI Grading Platform). With advancements in artificial intelligence, AI grading systems have demonstrated high efficiency and accuracy in objective question correction and preliminary scoring of certain subjective questions (e.g., structured responses). The AI Grading Platform developed by the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (HKEAA) exemplifies this progress. It can automatically identify and grade math multiple-choice and fill-in-the-blank questions, while providing keyword-matching scoring for solution steps with over 92% accuracy. This liberates teachers from tedious mechanical grading tasks, allowing them to focus more on in-depth analysis of students' problem-solving approaches, personalized learning diagnostics, and instructional design optimization. Pilot data from a Hong Kong primary school shows that after implementing AI grading, teachers reduced homework grading time by approximately 40% while increasing time for lesson preparation and individual tutoring by 25%, significantly enhancing teaching efficiency and quality. Empowered by technology, assessment has evolved from mere "judgment" to "diagnosis" and "guidance," better aligning with modern education's expectations for teachers' roles.

Only by embedding assessment into the learning process can Hong Kong's curriculum reform vision of "using evaluation to enhance learning and improve teaching" be fully realized. Through functional, cultural, and technological transformations, mathematics education assessment in Hong Kong's primary schools will evolve from a mere adjunct to teaching into a core driver for deepening learning and elevating educational quality. This transformation will ultimately cultivate a new generation of Hong Kong students who possess not only solid mathematical literacy but also cultural confidence and innovative spirit.

 

References

[1]. Zhu Jinxin. Research on the Cultivation Path of Mathematics Teachers' Assessment Competence [J]. Journal of The Education University of Hong Kong, 2025,42(3)

[2]. Curriculum Development Council. Mathematics Curriculum Guidelines (Grades 1 to 6) [Z]. Hong Kong Education Bureau, 2000.

[3].  Zhang Qi. Research on Classroom Observation and Evaluation of Primary School Mathematics Teaching: From the Perspective of a Teaching and Research Officer [D]. Shanxi University, 2018.

[4]. Black P., Wiliam D. Classroom assessment to promote learning [M]. The University of Hong Kong Press, 2024.

[5]. Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. Basic Competency Assessment (BCA) Research Report [R]. 2025.

[6]. Ho, S. Y., & Chan, T. H. (2024). Game-Based Math Assessment: A Neuroscientific Perspective. Journal of Educational Measurement, 61(3), 45–67.

[7]. Hong Kong Education Bureau (2025). Implementation Guidelines for Practical Assessment in Primary School Mathematics Curriculum. Hong Kong Government Printing House.

[8]. Cheung, W. M. (2023). Error Analysis in Bilingual Mathematics Learning: A Case Study of South Asian Students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Bilingual Education, 17(2), 112–130.

[9]. Tse, S. K. (2024). Integrating Lingnan Culture into Mathematics Assessment: From Temple Roofs to Geometric Proofs. Journal of Chinese Mathematics Education, 33(1), 88–104. 12

[10]. Fung, A. Y. H. (2025). Dynamic Portfolio Assessment for Mathematical Problem-Solving. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 32(4), 511–532. 15

 


ISSN: 3066-229X  E-ISSN:3066-8034   Copyright © 2024 by Reviews Of Teaching

bottom of page